Subject: [woes] naming

From: Peter Saint-Andre <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 14:43:47 -0400

Encryption and Signing for JavaScript Applications = ESJA?

Pronounced "essjay" (Wikipedia users might get the joke)...

---

From: Matt Miller <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 14:49:58 -0400

On Jul 27, 2011, at 14:43, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:

> _______________________________________________
> woes mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/woes

I was becoming partial to Javascript Object Signing and Encrypting (JOSE)...

- m&m

Matt Miller - <[email-masked]>
Collaboration Software Group - Cisco Systems, Inc.

---

From: Peter Saint-Andre <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 14:56:59 -0400

> I was becoming partial to Javascript Object Signing and Encrypting (JOSE)...

Jose, can you see?

Works for me.

---

From: John Bradley <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 15:02:18 -0400

Woes makes me think of a Muddy Waters song. 

> Javascript Object Signing and Encrypting (JOSE)

Works for us South Americans.  Though I will insist on pronouncing it correctly.

John B.

---

From: Mike Jones <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 19:30:17 +0000

+1 to either JOSE or JOES

From: [email-masked] [mailto:[email-masked]] On Behalf Of John Bradley
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 12:02 PM
To: Peter Saint-Andre
Cc: [email-masked]
Subject: Re: [woes] naming

John B.

_______________________________________________
woes mailing list
[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/woes

---

From: Dick Hardt <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 12:58:28 -0700

+2 for JOES
+1 for JOSE

---

From: "Paul C. Bryan" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 13:13:57 -0700

+0 to ESJA
+1 to JOSE or JOES.
-1 to WOES.

Paul

---

From: Leif Johansson <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 22:54:11 +0200

> -1 to WOES.

SCHMOES ?

---

From: John Bradley <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 16:56:05 -0400

+1 JOSE 

On 2011-07-27, at 4:54 PM, Leif Johansson wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
> 
> iEYEARECAAYFAk4wevMACgkQ8Jx8FtbMZncqmQCfS9hLhQzuduhsqmfYBvgsw/pG
> WQkAn2CNYOhqo3vgwkQAlGoy8zaYKtrT
> =Vimg
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

---

From: Thomas Hardjono <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 20:00:44 -0400

+1 JOSE or JOES

________________________________________
From: [email-masked] [[email-masked]] On Behalf Of John Bradley [[email-masked]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 4:56 PM
To: Leif Johansson
Cc: [email-masked]
Subject: Re: [woes] naming

+1 JOSE

---

From: Phillip Hunt <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 20:41:02 -0400

+1 on joes or jose as well. 

Phil

---

From: Jeremy Laurenson <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 23:42:27 -0400

+1 JOES/JOSE

---

From: "Manger, James H" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 13:45:06 +1000

+1 JSONsec

--
James Manger

---

From: Phillip Hunt <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 00:07:43 -0400

Even better. +1

Phil

---

From: Lucy Lynch <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 05:35:28 -0700 (PDT)

> +1 JSONsec

if we're going that road... j0ze!#

+1 to JOSE or JOES