Subject: [XCON] CPCP issue 6: conference URI conflict

From: [email-masked]
Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 18:40:14 +0300

Conference URIs can be proposed by the creator of the conference policy. If the creator has proposed a conference URI, the server needs to decide whether it accept the name proposed by the client or not.  It does this determination by examining if the conference URI already exists or not.  

Currently, it is not defined how the CPS would react. The obvious answer is that is returns an error using the protocol that is used to place the rule on the server.

In XCAP, this means sending a 409 error response to the PUT detailing what went wrong. Since the document defines the behaviour of XCAP as a possible protocol to carry and manipulate conference policies, the 409 error response will be used.

Any objections?

Regards,
Hisham

_______________________________________________
XCON mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xcon