Subject: [XCON] Abandoning XCAP-based CPCP: reasons

From: Gonzalo Camarillo <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 22:52:32 +0200

Folks,

at some point, XCON was working on an XCAP-based mechanism (CPCP)
to perform conference control. It seems that OMA was interested in this 
solution, at least at that point (2005):

https://datatracker.ietf.org/documents/LIAISON/file260.pdf

Could somebody summarize the reasons why CPCP was abandoned? I believe 
it would be useful to understand those reasons in order to start working 
on the XCON conference control protocol and avoid whatever was wrong 
with the XCAP-based proposal.

Thanks,

Gonzalo

_______________________________________________
XCON mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xcon