Subject: Re: [xrblock] Call for adopting xr-quality-monitoring-06 as WG item

From: Hendrik Scholz <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 14:39:29 +0100

Hi!

I do not have any bias towards splitting the draft again.
In the end somebody requiring only a part
(e.g. Single Stream per SSRC Segment) would not have to
implement the other two options when sending out reports.

Coming from the standardization point of view my question
would be if we even know what people would use to
implement anything beyond domain-internal statistics (e.g.
SLAs). Clearly there are lots of combinations which might
yield irrelevant or wrong results.
Anybody who wants to use the reports would have to define
which algorithms are allowed for the specific use case.
I assume that this would be done outside the draft and some
operators might even define the allowed algorithms in their
service level agreements.

Btw: The Calculation Algorithm is sometimes referred to
as CALg and not CAlg as it should.

Cheers,
 Hendrik

-- 
Hendrik Scholz <[email-masked]>