Subject: [6lo] Resolution to Adrian's "IPv6-over-foo" comment

From: Brian Haberman <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 10:09:30 -0400

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: RE: Adrian Farrel's Block on charter-ietf-6lo-00-00: (with 
BLOCK and COMMENT)
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 03:25:47 +0100
From: Adrian Farrel <[email-masked]>
Reply-To: [email-masked]
To: 'Ted Lemon' <[email-masked]>
CC: 'The IESG' <[email-masked]>

In my defence I was at the end of a long haul flight

A

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ted Lemon [mailto:[email-masked]]
> Sent: 25 August 2013 20:54
> To: Adrian Farrel
> Cc: The IESG
> Subject: Re: Adrian Farrel's Block on charter-ietf-6lo-00-00: (with BLOCK and
> COMMENT)
>
> On Aug 25, 2013, at 2:54 PM, Adrian Farrel <[email-masked]> wrote:
> > TCP is an IP-over-foo technology.
>
> TCP is a foo-over-IP technology, not an IP-over-foo technology.   Possibly the
> charter needs to be more explicit about what "foo" means, but it's hard to see
> how this would be a reason for that to be the case.