Subject: [AAA-DOCTORS] FW: PRELIMINARY Agenda and Package for October 8, 2009 Telechat

From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 10:37:21 +0200

Please find below the preliminary agenda of the IESG telechat on 10/8.
Please send your comments, questions and concerns before 10/7 COB. 

Thanks and Regards,

Dan

-----Original Message-----
From: [email-masked] [mailto:[email-masked]] On Behalf Of
IESG Secretary

2.1 WG Submissions
2.1.1 New Item
  o draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-resumption-08.txt
    IKEv2 Session Resumption (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 7 
    Note: Paul Hoffman ([email-masked]) is the document shepherd.

    Token: Pasi Eronen
  o draft-ietf-mipshop-pfmipv6-09.txt
    Fast Handovers for Proxy Mobile IPv6 (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 7 
    Note: Vijay Devarapalli ([email-masked]) is the document
shepherd.
 
    Token: Jari Arkko
  o draft-ietf-pmol-sip-perf-metrics-04.txt
    SIP End-to-End Performance Metrics (Proposed Standard) - 3 of 7 
    Note: Vijay Gurbani is the PROTO-shepherd 
    Token: Dan Romascanu
  o draft-ietf-dime-diameter-cmd-iana-01.txt
    Updated IANA Considerations for Diameter Command Code Allocations
(Proposed 
    Standard) - 4 of 7 
    Note: Victor Fajardo ([email-masked]) is the
document
 
    shepherd. 
    Token: Ron Bonica
  o draft-ietf-yam-rfc1652bis-pre-evaluation-00.txt
    Preliminary Evaluation of RFC 1652 for Advancement to Full Standard 
    (Standard) - 5 of 7 
    Note: This draft contains the list of changes planned by the YAM WG
to
move 
    RFC 1652 to Full Standard. There is no intention to publish this
document 
    as an RFC, so IESG should vote on this document as if RFC 1652 is
advancing 
    to Full Standard.. S Moonesamy <[email-masked]> has agreed
to 
    serve as the document shepherd, but note that there is no
shepherding

    write-up for this document. 
    Token: Alexey Melnikov
  o draft-ietf-mpls-tp-oam-requirements-03.txt
    Requirements for OAM in MPLS Transport Networks (Proposed Standard)
-
6 of 
    7 
    Note: Loa Andersson ([email-masked]) is the document shepherd.. Note that
this 
    document is a requirement document, for reasons that have. to do
with

    referencibility by ITU-T we have opted to put it on the standards
track. 
    The same decision applies to all MPLS-TP requirement. documents. 
    Token: Adrian Farrel
  o draft-ietf-mpls-tp-nm-req-05.txt
    MPLS TP Network Management Requirements (Proposed Standard) - 7 of 7

    Note: Loa Andersson ([email-masked]) is the Document Shepherd.. Note that
this 
    document is a requirement document. For reasons that. have to do
with
how 
    the ITU-T can reference RFCs we have opted to put. it on the
Standards
 
    Track. 
    Token: Adrian Farrel

2.1.2 Returning Item
  o draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpsecure-12.txt
    Improving TCP's Robustness to Blind In-Window Attacks (Proposed
Standard) - 
    1 of 2 
    Note: IESG: Please read the Document Shepherd Writeup, we need to
discuss 
    the "Updates: 793" issue. 
    Token: Lars Eggert
  o draft-ietf-mboned-lightweight-igmpv3-mldv2-05.txt
    Lightweight IGMPv3 and MLDv2 Protocols (BCP) - 2 of 2 
    Token: Ron Bonica

2.2 Individual Submissions
2.2.1 New Item
NONE
2.2.2 Returning Item
NONE

3. Document Actions

3.1 WG Submissions
	Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable
	contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it
covers? If
	not, what changes would make it so?"

3.1.1 New Item
  o draft-ietf-simple-interdomain-scaling-analysis-08.txt
    Presence Interdomain Scaling Analysis for SIP/SIMPLE (Informational)
-
1 of 
    10 
    Note: Ben Campbell is document shepherd 
    Token: Robert Sparks
  o draft-ietf-krb-wg-cross-problem-statement-04.txt
    Problem statement on the cross-realm operation of Kerberos
(Informational) 
    - 2 of 10 
    Token: Tim Polk
  o draft-ietf-speermint-requirements-07.txt
    SPEERMINT Requirements for SIP-based Session Peering (Informational)
-
3 of 
    10 
    Token: Cullen Jennings
  o draft-ietf-speermint-voip-consolidated-usecases-14.txt
    VoIP SIP Peering Use Cases (Informational) - 4 of 10 
    Token: Cullen Jennings
  o draft-ietf-roll-home-routing-reqs-08.txt
    Home Automation Routing Requirements in Low Power and Lossy Networks

    (Informational) - 5 of 10 
    Note: JP Vasseur ([email-masked]) is the document shepherd 
    Token: Adrian Farrel
  o draft-ietf-msec-tesla-for-alc-norm-08.txt
    Use of TESLA in the ALC and NORM Protocols (Experimental) - 6 of 10 
    Token: Tim Polk
  o draft-ietf-rtgwg-lf-conv-frmwk-06.txt
    A Framework for Loop-free Convergence (Informational) - 7 of 10 
    Token: Ross Callon
  o draft-ietf-rtgwg-ipfrr-framework-12.txt
    IP Fast Reroute Framework (Informational) - 8 of 10 
    Token: Ross Callon
  o draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-ipv6-config-02.txt
    IPv6 Configuration in IKEv2 (Experimental) - 9 of 10 
    Note: Paul Hoffman ([email-masked]) is the document shepherd.

    Token: Tim Polk
  o draft-ietf-eai-downgraded-display-02.txt
    Displaying Downgraded Messages for Email Address
Internationalization

    (Experimental) - 10 of 10 
    Note: Harald Alvestrand agreed to shepherd the document 
    Token: Alexey Melnikov

3.1.2 Returning Item
NONE

3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD
	Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable
	contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it
covers? If
	not, what changes would make it so?"

3.2.1 New Item
  o draft-harkins-emu-eap-pwd-08.txt
    EAP Authentication Using Only A Password (Informational) - 1 of 2 
    Token: Russ Housley
  o draft-iana-ipv4-examples-02.txt
    IPv4 Address Blocks Reserved for Documentation (Informational) - 2
of
2 
    Token: Russ Housley

3.2.2 Returning Item
NONE
3.3 Independent Submissions Via RFC Editor
	The IESG will use RFC 3932 responses: 1) The IESG has not
	found any conflict between this document and IETF work; 2) The
	IESG thinks that this work is related to IETF work done in WG
	<X>, but this does not prevent publishing; 3) The IESG thinks
	that publication is harmful to work in WG <X> and recommends
	not publishing at this time; 4) The IESG thinks that this
	document violates the IETF procedures for <X> and should
	therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG
	approval; 5) The IESG thinks that this document extends an
	IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should
	therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG
approval.

	The document shepherd must propose one of these responses in
	the Data Tracker note and supply complete text in the IESG
	Note portion of the write-up. The Area Director ballot positions
	indicate consensus with the response proposed by the
	document shepherd.

	Other matters may be recorded in comments, and the comments will
	be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the
document.

3.3.1 New Item
  o draft-keromytis-keynote-x509-02.txt
    X.509 Key and Signature Encoding for the KeyNote Trust Management
System 
    (Informational) - 1 of 1 
    Token: Tim Polk

3.3.2 Returning Item
  o draft-templin-ranger-07.txt
    Routing and Addressing in Next-Generation EnteRprises (RANGER) 
    (Informational) - 1 of 2 
    Token: Jari Arkko
  o draft-irtf-mobopts-mmcastv6-ps-08.txt
    Multicast Mobility in MIPv6: Problem Statement and Brief Survey 
    (Informational) - 2 of 2 
    Note: Rajeev Koodli ([email-masked]) is the document
shepherd. 
    Token: Jari Arkko

3.3.3 For Action
  o draft-levy-sip-diversion-10.txt
    Diversion Indication in SIP (Historic) - 1 of 1 
    Token: Robert Sparks

4. Working Group Actions
4.1 WG Creation
4.1.1 Proposed for IETF Review
    NONE
4.1.2 Proposed for Approval
  o Multipath TCP (mptcp) - 1 of 1
    Token: Magnus Westerlund
4.2 WG Rechartering
4.2.1 Under evaluation for IETF Review
    NONE
4.2.2 Proposed for Approval
  o Behavior Engineering for Hindrance Avoidance (behave) - 1 of 2
    Token: Magnus Westerlund
  o Access Node Control Protocol (ancp) - 2 of 2
    Token: Ralph Droms