Subject: Re: [Anima] Summary status of ANIMA drafts submission

From: "Benoit Claise (bclaise)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2014 09:35:32 +0000

If approve by an AD, yes

B.

Envoyé depuis un mobile Samsung

-------- Message d'origine --------
De : "Michael Behringer (mbehring)" <[email-masked]>
Date : 01/11/2014 6:46 (GMT+01:00)
A : "Benoit Claise (bclaise)" <[email-masked]>,Sheng Jiang <[email-masked]>,[email-masked]
Objet : RE: [Anima] Summary status of ANIMA drafts submission

Ah, so we CAN still submit??? Sorry I was unaware. Will do this first thing Monday.

Michael

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Benoit Claise (bclaise)
> Sent: 31 October 2014 15:17
> To: Sheng Jiang; Michael Behringer (mbehring); [email-masked]
> Subject: Re: [Anima] Summary status of ANIMA drafts submission
>
> Dear draft-pritikin-bootstrapping-keyinfrastructures authors,
> >>> We are missed one essential component draft that was agreed in the
> >>> initial
> >>> plan:
> >>>
> >>> draft-X-anima-trust-bootstrap (Who is responsible?). If people are
> >>> still working on it, it may be submitted after the online draft
> >>> submission tool reopen at the night of Oct. 8.
> >> This is draft-pritikin-bootstrapping-keyinfrastructures. It didn't
> >> get re-submitted with "anima" in the title, but this is the draft.
> > Hi, Michael,
> >
> > Even the content remains unchanged, re-submitted with "anima" in the
> title would be helpful. For now, this draft does not appear on the WG pages,
> link below, which is auto generated based on the document naming rules.
> >
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/anima/documents/
> >
> > Therefore, it is highly possible many people who are interested in ANIMA
> would miss this draft.
> >
> > So, please do re-submit this draft with "anima" when the online draft
> submission tool reopen at the night of Nov. 9th. We will have the meeting
> on the Monday, Nov. 10th.
> Even better. Rename your draft to
> draft-pritikin-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfrastructures, send it now to
> [email-masked], and cc me.
>  From there, I will approve the post.
>
> Regards, Benoit
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Sheng
> >
> >> Michael
> >>
> >>> More contributions and drafts are always welcome.
> >>>
> >>> The status of the ANIMA meeting in the coming IETF91 will only be
> >>> decided at this week's IESG meeting and the chairs are not yet
> >>> known. Therefore,
> >> the
> >>> agenda process is running late.
> >>>
> >>> Best regards,
> >>>
> >>> Sheng
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Anima mailing list
> >>> [email-masked]
> >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
> > _______________________________________________
> > Anima mailing list
> > [email-masked]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima
> >