Subject: Re: [Anima] BRSKI#43, Figure 5 YANG Tree diagram for Voucher-Request

From: Michael Richardson <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 16:00:36 -0400

Thomas has pointed out that the "pinned-domain-cert" and "last-renewal-date"
fields which are defined in RFC8366 are not clearly specified for the
voucher-request.

Neither are needed or appropriate in a voucher-request.
I have edited the YANG to include:

      refine "voucher/pinned-domain-cert" {
        mandatory false;
        description "A voucher-request field
                     is not valid in a voucher request, and
                     any occurrence MUST be ignored";
      }

      refine "voucher/last-renewal-date" {
        description "A last-renewal-date field
                     is not valid in a voucher request, and
                     any occurrence MUST be ignored";
      }

This is, I think, an editorial change.

--
Michael Richardson <[email-masked]>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-