Subject: Re: RFC 2558 interpretation

From: "Francesco Pasio" <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 8 May 2001 14:15:59 +0200

That's OK for me too.

Francesco

"C. M. Heard" <[email-masked]> on 08/05/2001 08.42.23

                                                              

 To:      [email-masked]                      
                                                              
 cc:      (bcc: Francesco Pasio/MAIN/MC1)                     

 Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: RFC 2558 interpretation                

On Mon, 7 May 2001, Kaj Tesink wrote:

> ok, i guess there are 2 places to clarify this; in SES or CV definition.
> the simple fix in the SES definition:
[snip]
>
> |       Note that CV counts should be frozen during SESs.
> |

Sounds good to me.

Mike