Subject: Re: Question RE: RFC 2558

From: Kaj Tesink <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 09:00:47 -0500

At 03:58 PM 3/11/2002 -0500, Truong, Jeff wrote:
>Mr. Tesink,
>
>I have a question regarding the sonetSectionCurrentStatus (and likewise for
>the corresponding objects for line, path, and VT):
>
>Should these defects represent the status at that moment in time or should
>it indicate that defect(s) occurred during this 'current 15-min interval' up
>to the polling moment?  Another word, if at second #15 into this current
>interval a LOS defect occurs and clear at second #300, and a GET request
>arrives at second # 600, should this LOS bit be set?
>
>Thank you very much for your clarification.

Jeff,

the objects you ask about refer to defects. defects are
defined in the preamble of the document.

I copy your comments to the discussionlist of the atommib wg
which is the appropriate forum to discuss these issues. See
http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/atommib-charter.html
for subscription info.

Note that 2558 is being evaluated right now and implementation experience is
being requested. Please send your implementation report to
Faye Ly <[email-masked]>
Use the compliance clause as guidance.

kaj

>Regards,
>
>Jeff Truong
>Siemens Information and Communication Networks
>400 Rinehart Road
>Lake Mary, FL 32746
>407-942-5518
>[email-masked]

_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/

Kaj Tesink
Telcordia Technologies. In.
331 Newman Springs Road
Red Bank, NJ 07701
Email: kaj @research.telcordia.com
Tel: (732) 758-5254
Fax: (732) 758-4177

_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/