Subject: RE: Closing out alarm/arc issues

From: "Lam, Hing-Kam (Kam)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2002 10:18:36 -0400

Hi,

For the ARC MIB (draft-ietf-disman-conditionmib-02.txt), no open issues have been identified. If you see differently, please raise the issue.

Note that draft-ietf-disman-conditionmib-02.txt now contains only the ARC MIB. The Condition MIB is no longer in -02.

For the Condition MIB module, which was contained in the previous version -01 (i.e., draft-ietf-disman-conditionmib-01.txt), the open issue is its relationship with the Alarm MIB. However, unless someone wants to continue the Condition MIB module, otherwise the issue will be dropped along with the Condition MIB module.

Regards,
Kam

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Randy Presuhn [mailto:[email-masked]]
> Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 5:17 PM
> To: [email-masked]
> Subject: Closing out alarm/arc issues
> 
> 
> Hi -
> 
> I've asked the editors of our alarm-related documents
> to re-post their open issues one-by-one, with proposed
> resolutions.  In each case, if no objections are raised within
> one week of the posting, I will declare consensus so we can
> finish this work and move on.
> 
>  ------------------------------------------------------
>  Randy Presuhn          BMC Software, Inc.  1-3141
>  [email-masked]  2141 North First Street
>  Tel: +1 408 546-1006   San Jose, California 95131  USA
>  ------------------------------------------------------
>  My opinions and BMC's are independent variables.
>  ------------------------------------------------------
>