Subject: Nutritionists/Docs shocked

From: Block Absorption of Carbs <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 09:21:59 -0700

Dr.Oz begs the question:
"Did you know you can get your body to stop absorbing carbs?"

- Now, for the first time DrOz is presenting the "Carb Blocker" -
- Enjoy: - pasta - bread - pizza  (w/out absorbing the carbs)

View Here: / http://www.emesisdress.com/docoz/discovery/episode.index

It will have you losing 230% More... W/Out the gym.

-DrOz Summer Blog

We hope that you enjoyed this wellness update - to edit your subscription write- Member Update Systems
9167 ROAD one seven seven_Oakwood, OH 45873 or visit http://www.emesisdress.com/4kr/dgr03/mgfe.ewkrtf

e actual problem being solved here - what if I just provided references to the required js files for jQuery and Cordova in my index.html and then redirect to say login page from a 3rd js file using jQuery's $.mobile.changePage? I mean what stops this design from working and why do I need the solutions outlined below? Is it because there are asynchronous loads inside jQuery and/or Cordova and my 3rd js file could be loaded even before the 2 frameworks are loaded? Please sugges, this should be the correct answer. +1 from me.   smanandhar ould you elaborate a little more please? What's the hierarchy of file references look like? Thanks   farjam Not only should this be the accepted answer, it should also be the template for cordova as it ships, callback hell is for a different I couldn't get this to work with jQM 1.3 & PG 2.5   fusion27 Mar 13 '13 at 13:38Please, could you add the order of the script loading, using latest version ??   should be loaded after the code in this example. i.e:
  assuming the code is in a file called environment.js, the scripts should be loaded in this order: jquery, environment, jquery.mobile. Hope that helps.   rilla Mar 21 '13 at 19:32 
4	  	
For all those who say it doesn't work - the order of declaring script matters. First include jquery, THEN THIS CODE inside a script element, then jquery mobile js.   Manish May 18 '13 at 20:00
  	  	
Most answers here do not even work  your 'simple' assignment operator is not a valid move-assignment operator. If I have a class A that has a member class B and B uses 'your' assignment operator that class A can not get an implicit move-assignment operator AND move-constructor. All the members of A must have a valid tree of valid move-constructors/assignment operators. And as I just said that operator of yours is not a valid move-assignment operator.   Daan Timmer Dec 13 '13 at 10:45
  	  	
@Daan that's not correct. Well, you are right that the 'simple' operator shown is not a move assignment operator. It is a copy-assignment operator (that incidentally can also be used for moves). But the rest is not correct. As a simple counter example, consider a class foo with a unique_ptr member and another member of a type with a copy assignment, but no move assignment. Do you think foo will not have a move assignment operator? Also consider that built-in types don't have move assignment operators. Does that mean any class with an int member does not have a move assignment operatorThe only drawback with NumericUpDown is that it provides no feedback when you enter a value outside of the Maximum or Minimum allowed values - it just changes what you've typed. A TextBox can at least allow invalid values so you can warn the user when they submit the form.   Matt Hamilton Jan 20 '09 at 22:12
3	  	
That's true - the user could always paste in some non-numeric characters. You would hope that the form validation would catch that though, since at some point you're gonna want to do an Int32.TryParse or something.   Matt Hamilton Jan 20 '09 at 22:41
17	  	
You'll need some addition effort to globalize this by replacing checks forith checks on CultureInfo.CurrentCulture.NumberFormat.NumberDecimalSeparator.