Subject: Remodeling Trend Alert

From: Maintain your Safety while Bathing <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2014 14:00:16 -0700

****************************
Safety Standard Alert
published - June 6, 2014
****************************

Posted - 

Bathing should be a soothing experience, regardless of age or mobility challenges.

When it comes to your daily routine, you should never have to choose between comfort, 
safety and independenceand now, with Walk-In Tubs... you dont have to.

View Safety Features Here: / http://www.roundte.com/home/safety/improvement.index

We are happy to have introduces you to a growing trend in bathroom remodeling.

- 

- modification requests directed to - Update Notice Messages
1 1 8-Kecks Ln-Ruff Dale, PA 15679 or http://www.roundte.com/65sf/h6t6r.wrg5638

opular question, so I'd like to clarify on the top comment here. I just executed commands as described in this answer and it hasn't removed ALL the local files. Only the remotely tracked files were overwritten, and every local file that has been here was left untouched.   Red Nov 22 '12 at 10:38
1	  	
So, why not just locally delete your files and do a simple git pull?   Jason Mar 23 '13 at 16:18
3	  	
Ah crap, I just lost all my days work.   Jimbo Apr 19 '13 at 16:32
3	  	
This worked for me and my local files were NOT deleted.   Tastybrownies May 21 '13 at 18:16
2	  	
@Jason - because typing two commands is way faster than manual navigating to even single file located somewhere. Sometimes I need to reset many files and I prefer to not spend next hour on file hunting.   Bulwersator Oct 1@Bulwersator I see your point. I was referring to deleting all files in the repo and git pull rather than --all I lost all local commits that weren't in the origin/master tree after a rebase. It's very possible to shoot You can also do this for a tracking branch if you have the same branch in origin and locally, just change git @MichaelKMadison, man git-push | grep match -B10 says git push origin : will do the trick for your once-only matching override of the simple config option. Works for me, but you have to specify the remote name (typically origin). A git push --matching would make more sense to me, but much of git is over my head anyway.   hobs Feb Actually, the git docs are as concise as hammar's explanation. However, hammar's explanation is much more useful t
 o me because it explains why you'd choose one over the other in addition to explaining the behavior in a much more understandable way. As is too often the case, the git docs explain things for someone who is an expert in git. I read the git docs entry for push.default and was still lost. This answer makes things perfectly clear.   I realize this is an old post but as I just ran into the same issue and had trouble finding the answer I thought s answer is correct. Using push.default simple is, in a way, like configuring tracking on your branches so you don't need to specify remotes and branches when pushing and pulling. The matching option will push all branches to their corresponding counterparts on the default remote (which is the first one that was set up unless you've One thing I hope others find useful in the future is that I was running Git 1.8 on OS X Mountain Lion and never saw this error. Upgrading to Mavericks is what suddenly made it show up (running git --version will show
  git version 1.8.3.4 (Apple Git-47) which I'd never seen until the update to the OS.

share|improve this answer
answered Oct 26 '13 at 17:00

Bill
10427
1	  	
I also started seeing this after upgrading to Mavericks. So I guess Git was upgraded at the same time as Mavericks, like you are implying.   Per Lundberg Nov 1 '13 at 7:52
add comment
up vote
1
down vote
If you get a message from git complaining about the value 'simple' in the configuration, check your git version.

After upgrading XCode (on a Mac running Mountain Lion), which also upgraded git from 1.7.4.4 to 1.8.3.4, shells started before the upgrade were still running git 1.7.4.4 and complained about the value 'simple' for push.default in the global config.

The solution was to close the shells running the old version of git and use the new version.
git rm -r --cached . removed way more files than was in the git ignore for me :( :(. It removed files in directories that I don't even have listed   Dean Hiller Aug 14 '12 at 20:07
  	  	
Does git rm -r --cached actually remove everything from the index? By definition, the index is just the staging area, the place where files are before you commit. Or are there 2 definitions of "index"? (btw, it was successful for me)   dmonopoly Aug 15 '12 at 22:16 
  	  	
OMG I was so afraid that this deleted all of my previous commits bc for some reason it took some time for my previous commits to appear in Xcode x_x Thank goodness they are still there!   Ken M. Haggerty Nov 22 '12 at 6:23
  	  	
this doesn't work for me. xcode 4.5 still tracks the user interface state file. grrr. what to do?   acecapades Jan 17 '13 at 8:03
  	  	
This is the go to solution for properly .gitignoring files that you were previously tracking. Like... if you start a project by tracking everything (git add .) and then later figure out that you want to .gitignore application/config/database.php (without doing what @trobrock says to do in his answer above, git will just continue to track the contents of the application/config/database.php file).   John Erck Jan 31 '13 at 23:21
  	  	
Awesome! There