Subject: Lose 7-lbs by Aug 21

From: Discover Extreme Fat-Burning <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2014 07:17:42 -0700

Hey Atompub-archive,

When Stacey hit her 40's, the weight just seemed to be piling up. 
She'd tried the low carb, high protein things w/no results...

After 10 days she lost 12-lbs and dropped a dress size. 
Her secret was recently revealed on the DocOz Show

View Clip Here: http://www.underneathley.com/google-fast-rt-index.html

Amazing Right? 
Just like that, you can stop absorbing Carbs. 

[DocOz Blog Clips]
August 15, 2014

`
`
`~
~
~

To stop further wellness updates - visit here - http://www.underneathley.com/87.ht4 - or write to 
-- Updated Notifications Services
115 Hadley Way-Counce, TN 38326-- 

=
=
=
'm not sure why 'the base class is abstract?' figures into the discussion.. the LSP: will all functions that operate on Dogs work if Poodle objects are passed in ? If yes, then Poodle is can be substituted for Dog and hence can inherit from Dog. I will definitely look into LSP. But before that, can you please provide an "example where inheritance is proper in which base class cannot be abstract". What I think is, inheritance is applicable only if base class is abstract. If base class need to be instantiated separately, do not go for inheritance. That is,  reading WCF lately. An example in the .net framework is SynchronizationContext (base + can be instantiated) which queues work onto a ThreadPool thread. Derivations include WinFormsSyncContext (queue onto UI Thread) and  Thanks. However, it would be more helpful if you can provide a scenario based on Bank domain, HR domain,  I'm not familiar with those domains.. Another example if the previous one was too obtuse is the Control class 
 in Winforms/WPF. The base/generic control can be instantiated. Derivations include etc. Now that I think of it, the Decorator Design pattern is a good example IMHO and useful too. The decorator er") and automatically get public accessors that let you get with "obj.whatever" and setwhile really manipulating a member instance variable. If you ever later need to change or extend the class internals without changing the public interface, you just remove the default reader/write/accessor and simply write the new mw else to say it. "Accessors" is  If you need to reach into it and manipulate the state directly, it's not an object in the OOP sense of that term yes I agree. I think you're mis-interpreting my statement. I wasn't saying that ruby accessors were good OOP, they are convenient for simple data structures though that aren't supposed to be fully fledged classes, but may be more functional than a  but perhaps I misintepreted you too. I thought you said you were not opposed to C# prop
 erties for such cases. I was just drawing an analogy. But if you are opposed to such constructs in all cases, even simple data structures,  that nobody said anything about that... but getter setters can be useful while debugging,tracing code. It's not exactly possible to easily track everytime a public attribute is read/written/deleted... But with accessors/properties you can just add a trace inside the function you want or a breakpoint.   Loc  always all these comments, suggestions, answers are just nonsesne, because they exclude each other. I guess that you people only want to shine without thinking.. Could you explain more about your first comment? As a non native speaker, I am having a difficult time understanding a bit. Do you got any article on the subject? Sorry for ressurrecting such topic.