Subject: Full-Size Decks | Bird Houses

From: Manly Man's Hobby <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 10:27:00 -0700

The Hobby that will Improve Your Status Is...

View / http://www.hahoms.com/Hobby/kit/for/download.index

The craft combines the innate manliness of working with your hands and the 
ability to produce finished products that are functional, artistic, or both.

#1 Rated Hobby is Woodworking.

In honor of the top rated hobby, below is a comprehensive shed and woodworking package with plans and step-by-step instructions. This package is for beginners or advanced woodworkers.

Download Plans Here -> http://www.hahoms.com/Hobby/kit/for/download.index

-
-
-
-
To stop further updates - visit http://www.hahoms.com/9yg/dflo/w3lrf.o4t or write stop to Alert Center Notifications
1400 South Jama G o d d a r d, KS 67052

 VS2010 isn't exactly what I'd call speedy. Also note I said "most" and "usually". And, of course, that performance was a huge problem during the development of VS2010, as documented on various MSDN blogs. The current performance level (which really isn't impressive) wasn't easily achieved, and most WPF apps I've seen neckbeard is strong). Yep, MS definitely did put off optimization towards the end of 2010 (that's why it was delayed, IIRC). Of course, that's usually considered a good thing. The main issue I have with your statement is 've got a stupid little POS WPF app that has pretty damned complex UI designed for a touchscreen that runs on a relatively ancient vanilla Dell p4 with a gig of memory and XP. And it manages to keep up the pace in a busy bar simply "screw hardware acceleration, what matters is perceived performance". I never said anything about whether it was easy to code and maintain, I never said "WPF is evil, and must be burned at the stake". I never said that I hate
 d it, or that I don't appreciate it. But someone above suggested that WPF is better because it is I don't know if I can express it much clearer. You come across like a rabid fanboy though, which isn't making it eaiser. Rather than blindly defending WPF against (non-existent) criticism, read what I wrote. I never said WPF Also, MS did not put off optimization until the end. It was an ongoing priority, they just failed at it until near the end, and it's hardly a good thing when it forces the product to be delayed. Again, they documented pretty thoroughly on blogs and elsewhere that they focused on performance from day 1, and they thought they were  Not a rabid fanboi, just tired of fud. Responding to your comparison of dissimilar things resulting in your opinion that "WPF at best achieves parity" and that the current performance level of 2010 isn't "impressive." I base my statements on when performance was concentrated on comes from scottgu; I leave it to when you start doing more imp
 ressive things like using shaders or animation or HD video that video acceleration better than WinForms, but it feels like there's something slowing it down, and when pressing hard, it shows. Occasional lags add up. As of Qt, Qt uses native controls so it depends on the OS. I'm not comparing their perf, they're based on different technologies (and IE9 still lags in UX behind Chrome despite hw acceleration), I just Qt is cross-platform and this is something that will count in the near future. MS time is over, better start irrelevant if it doesn't make the apps actually feel faster". WPF uses hardware acceleration to improve fidelity, not just performance. So that point is obviously not irrelevant.