Subject: Make Summer Beauty Last

From: Prettier Skin Tip <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 08:30:25 -0700

Women's Beauty Daily
---------------------
- Digital Edition -

Regretting years of skipping out on sunblock?

Your not the only one. Real women have real issues, and this is one. 

Ellen Degeneres recently opened up about the skin care regimine she used to get ready 
for her vow renewal to Portia. 

View her great skin at the event here -> http://www.cellphidot.com/ellen/skin/secret.html

---
Doc's reveal her trick here -> http://www.cellphidot.com/ellen/skin/secret.html

/
/
/
/
To stop further messages - visit here http://www.cellphidot.com/67i/dsrgt34.r4t54 or write stop to Daily Updated Alerts
9306 B o v a C o u r t - Louisville, KY four zero two nine one
/
Also, scraping fairly regularly formatted data from large documents is going to be WAY faster with judicious use ichaelJohnston "Less fragile"? Almost certainly not. Regexes care about text-formatting details than an XML parser can silently ignore. Switching between &foo; encodings and CDATA sections? Using an HTML minifier to remove all whitespace in your document that the browser doesn't render? An XML parser won't care, and neither will a well-written XPath statement. A regex-based "parser", on the other handfor an one time job it's ok, and for spaces we use that works for spaces, but newlines are also valid  matches space, tab, form feed, carriage return, line feed, and possible more. Unless you are using multi-line mode it works. -- multi-line mode (default in many environments) was the point. Also, note that you've focused  If it's the default you can always disable it... If I was to use this kind of regex I will disable it. Plus it's disabled by default in many programming lan
 guages. For entities I can decode them, for other weird stuff I use regex to filter them out. And this is not the kind of thing to argue, because 1.it won't stop and indeed, if having to know all the gotchas and workarounds to get an 80% solution that fails the rest of the time "works for you", I can't stop you. Meanwhile, I'm over on my side of the fence using parsers that work had to pull some data off ~10k pages, all with the same HTML template. They were littered with HTML errors that caused parsers to choke, and all their styling was inline or with <font> etc.: no classes or IDs to help navigate the DOM. After fighting all day with the "right" approach, I finally switched to a regex solution and had it working in an hour.  can use tidy to create valid a large page to get all the data in a large table is much faster than using there was a question that this didn't might surprise us all one day. You never know.  definitely less fragile. When the third-party changes their html, th
 ey are much more likely to change the structure (breaking your xpaths) than the leaf nodes you are scraping. Scraping is not parsing. Scraping is pulling specific bits of data from a puddle of designer contaminated crap you don't care about. You DO NOT WANT to parse that puddle. You want to do only the absolute minimum amount of "parsing" that will get you your data. You don't CARE about the structure. You care about your you're talking about XML parser, since when an XML parser can read a HTML page? Have you ever tried to load a random webpage from the Internet via an XmlParser (class in an arbitrary language)? I would take it to the level, that probably it's possible that even some W3C valid XHTMLs would fail using XML parsers... look at this page's source for exampleConsider that if her purpose is to promote the "Paris Hilton"-brand she is quite successful indicating she is pretty smart. Proof: She has a sister - heard of her?