Subject: Starbucks Survey Winner (08/20)

From: Starbucks Summer Rewards <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 07:58:34 -0700

Starbucks Coffee

Redeem Your Starbucks Rewards Today!

Starbucks is the largest coffeehouse company in the world.

Do you love Starbucks products? Share your opinion by completing this survey and claim your rewards!

All You Need to Do is:

Redeem Your Gift-Card Here!

If you no longer wish to receive email notifications, please click here or write to Daily Updated Alerts 9306 BOVA CT Louisville, KY 40291

Another reason to use void(0): preventing the browser from scrolling to the top as it will try to look for name='' upon clicking open every link in a new tab and this is the reason why I personally hate it when people use the href="javascript:void(0)" method why does this answer have so many upvotes? Any use of javascript: should be considered bad practice, obtrusive and doesn't graceful de-grade. two answers are far better and reasonable than this one. Also the first two arguments are invalid because event.preventDefault() is there exactly to prevent default behavior (like jumping to the top of the page in this case) and do a better job at it without all the return false; craziness.to 2013: )d HTTPS pages. One option would be then to use and event.preventDefault() in the handler, but I don't like this much. Perhaps you can establish a convention to use href='#void' and make sure no element on the page has id="void". That way, clickin
g a link to non-existing anchor will not scroll the page. can use "#" and then bind a click event to all links with as the href. This would be done in jQuery with: $('a[href="#"]').click(function(e) { e.preventDefault ? e.preventDefaul : e.returnValue = false;I like the idea of using a generic hashtag the best. How would I go about preventing the url from updating in the browser? That's my only thing about this good question; this seems to be working for me in modern browsers function history.replaceState(null, null, ); Haven't tested with IE, though MDN says it doesn't support and (at least IE8). replaceState is supported from IE10. the 2nd reason an advantage to the developer? I would not like things to carry on as usual when an error was thrown. about just leaving blank like so. I've read that works pretty well, and does in my experience. And it's still valid standards: you should only use href if you have a valid url and you should put that url between h
ref"" prior to page load. both of your methods are horrible for accessibility, usability, every other -ility that applies to web devSee note below on saving snapshots. As for general slowness, keep in mind the emulator is running a large amount of Java code, that's compiling to ARM, that's calling into a software emulated graphics device, all emulated on an x86 desktop OS. I love how fast the iPhone emulator is, but that's because you're compiling your app to x86. Android lets you run it (slowly) exactly how it will run on the device, including all your JNI and ARM NEON. That said, would love a fast pure java 'emulation' environment with the Dalvik VM retargeted to x86, for most people's needs.