Subject: Celeb Anti-Aging Exposed

From: Healthy Lifestyles <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 13:46:28 -0700

ATTN Atompub-archive,

This info has never been revealed to the public before. 
But your hearing it straight from the horse's mouth. 

>> Plastic Surgeons breaking silence on what Celebs really use for <<

- Wrinkles
- Fine Lines
- Crows Feet
- Premature Aging
- Sun Damage
- Sagging

See how Celebs are "faking facelifts"

-> / http://www.verticalred.com/surgeon/classified/info/revealed.html 

- message settings status w/ Alert System Notifications
one one zero seven Valeria Drive|Court Avenue|Des Moines, Iowa 50309
http://www.verticalred.com/nuy5/se/fgt.rgvsw

The process to redo this for new versions is not difficult, and I've included it here for reference.
Building distributeIn order to get the stub .exe files, you need to have a Visual Compiler (it is apparently compilable with MinGW as well)hg clone cd distributehg checkout 0.6.27
rem optionally, comment out tag_build and  is in distribut in pip\This should work, but it is worth noting that this could be extremely dangerous if one doesn't have the expertise or bother to inspect I think the simplicity is worth the risk. We are talking about a hack at python-distribute.org? There is a similar approach with sublime package control. I have checked the distribute URL and it is ok (for now at least). The problem is in the general case where the inexperienced run remote executables on recommendation from a forum. It should come at least with a minimal warning.   Gringo Suave Apr 3 '13 at 7:46  I understand. In practice people have found this not to be a problem but rather a huge advantage. That said, I can see that if you were an expert text parser, this would be a new skill to learn and it might feel unneeded and awkward at first. Agai to use bash via Cygwin on Windows but the forward vs. backward slash for paths killed it for me. The whole command line ecosystem ne
 eds to be working the same or it's frustrating and error prone.  thought programmers especially would understand the need for strongly-typed properties and not random perlthon text-parsing where anything can go wrong without you even knowing it before it's too late? ^^   Oskar Duveborn unix tools are so awesome and advanced. But depending on the text output having so many columns and this particular column is what I want is not so great. What if the command changes down the line. Your neat little script gets broken. And it is not as though you cannot do similar text manipulation with Powershell. But you do have the advantage of dealing with full fidelity objects. Powershell may never be as powerful as bash etc. but it did get this aspect right. 
		ove shell scripting and I tolerate PowerShell. It's commands and syntax are atrocious. Horribly long commands and options without any useful command completion. Or if there is I haven't found it. Too many features crammed into single commands that should be separated out. Weird variable and escape syntax only a DOS batch programm- You are right about not having found stuff. All commands have aliases, and many of them match both DOS and UNIX commands ( ps, dir, rm, ls, kill, history, man, cat, clear etc.) The names are long so that they have a meaningful name. Great for scripts -it helps when a new person has to use and maintain it. There is tab expansion for cmdlets, functions, variable, path, parameters etc. Much of the syntax is from Unix shells and what escape syntaxhis is a ""test""". Really, double the character to get two of them. But to output a string without interpreting a variable you use a back-tick. Lack of consistency? Yes. Hard to remember? Yes. Sometimes you have to 
 use a -LiteralPath argument.   Zan Lynx Aug 24 '11 at 5:32