Subject: Your adjusted payment (Home)

From: Regarding Lowering Your Home Payment <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2014 09:06:12 -0700

Your 2014 HARP 2.0Eligibility Verification--

Announced by Obama (Q4 2014)

Hello Atompub-archive

Verifying your eligibility you could reduce your payment significantly.

Your exact monthly savings can be seen: (1 minute check)

http://www.nariblek.com/naturopathy/encases/gaiters/doublewidth/irregulars/stiffed.html

Obama's | HARP 2.0

Current Low Rate: 2.99% Fixed

Note: Our records indicate that you have not checked your eligibility in 2014.

Regards,

U.S. Housing

Loan Officer

2014 USA Home Packer Associates

26 Jennifer Lynne Drive

knoxville, MD

To ensure that you receive emails from us, please add this address to your address book.

You have received this email because you registered an account at Textbroker. To discontinue receiving our newsletter, please click on the following link: unsub1.

This is more of a design question - since IEnumerator

already encapsulates all the necessary information (.Current, .MoveNext()) about something that can be enumerated, then what's the point of introducing a type (IEnumerable) whose sole purpose is to return an instance of the former?

To be specific:

Why can't foreach be designed to iterate directly through an IEnumerator, like so:

// foreach (var e in anEnumerator) { //... }
while (anEnumerator.MoveNext())
{
doSomething(anEnumerator.Current);
}
Why can't Linq be built based directly off of IEnumerator?FYI: platform string is important because it helps identifying HW model for programming purpose.

Below is my guess:

iPhone 6 (GSM): iPhone7,1
iPhone 6 (Global): iPhone7,2
iPhone 6 Plus (GSM): iPhone7,3
iPhone 6 Plus (Global): iPhone7,4