Subject: Re: [AVT] Discuss Mpeg2TS preamble - meeting room

From: "Ali C. Begen (abegen)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 09:44:35 -0800

Following up on Colin's earlier email:

We submitted a new version of our draft:
http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-begen-avt-rtp-mpeg2ts-preamble-04.txt 

There is technically no major change in this version. We fixed a few typos and added a few clarifications. We are still waiting for the other draft so that the WG can review both of them and move forward (see below). It has been already a month and I hope a revision for the other draft will be submitted soon.

Cheers, acbegen.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email-masked] [mailto:[email-masked]] On Behalf Of Colin Perkins
> Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 8:23 AM
> To: IETF AVT WG
> Subject: Re: [AVT] Discuss Mpeg2TS preamble - meeting room

[snip]
> Actions:
>
> *	Authors of the Xia draft to update their draft for clarity of English and to reflect
> the discussion, especially with respect to the exact amount of data that has to be sent in
> the preamble, and to change to using the RFC 2250 format
> *	Authors of the Xia draft to clarify its behaviour when using an encrypted MPEG2-TS.
> 
> 
> Once an update to the Xia draft, and the Begen draft if the authors have any changes they
> wish to make, is available, we expect the working group will be able to review both
> proposals to make a decision whether it prefers extensibility and flexibility (the Begen
> draft) or a slightly lower overhead with less flexibility (the Xia draft).