Subject: [AVTCORE] VVC payload format, open issue cluster #2 (editor-notes #9, #15, and #16)

From: Stephan Wenger <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 06:11:54 +0000

Hi,
This is the second in a series of emails in which we authors will try to propose ways to solve open issues indicated in the draft (https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-vvc-06).

Editor notes #9, #15, and #16 each request verification of certain features/numbers derived from the H.266 specification.

For editor note #9, we suggest replacing the term “level numbers” with “level values”.  Otherwise, the language has been verified as correct by both Yago and Ye-Kui.  Hence we suggest to remove editor note #9.

For editor notes #15 and #16 the numbers are now independently verified by Yago and by Ye-Kui Wang (who is the editor of the relevant part of the H.266 standard).  We indeed have output layer set numbers between 0 and 257, unintuitive as it may appear.  Therefore, we think we should remove the editor notes #15, and #16.

Unless people speak up here, we will make aforementioned changes in the next version.

Thanks,
Stephan