Subject: [Capwap] Proposed resolution for issue 100. Treatment of wireless management frames.

From: "Michael Montemurro" <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2006 15:38:41 -0400

Here is my proposed resolution to issue 100:

- Fix the default priority settings in section 11.6 to the values used in
section 4.3.3.

- Change the last paragraph in section 4.3 to state that radio technology
specific management frames are treated as CAPWAP control messages. It makes
sense because control frames are protected.

Does this make sense?

Cheers,

Mike
_________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit:
http://lists.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/capwap

Archives: http://lists.frascone.com/pipermail/capwap