Subject: Re: spec names (was: missing method)

From: Mayank Upadhyay <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 11:56:36 -0700 (PDT)

>> Makes sense. How about "classes spec" (Jack's) and "interfaces 
spec"
>> (mine)?
>
>No because Jack has agreed to produce an interface based
>specification per the feedback from the Minneapolis wg, and
>so we'll (soon hopefully_ have two interface based specifications.

That's true. Jack and I are wrapping up a proposal to make changes to 
draft-ietf-cat-gssv2-javabind-01.txt to address the issues raised at 
the CAT session. So we will end up having interfaces and concrete 
classes in what would have been draft-ietf-cat-gssv2-javabind-02.txt.

-Mayank

==========================================================================
This message was posted through the Stanford campus mailing list
server.  If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing list, send the
message body of "unsubscribe ietf-cat-wg" to [email-masked]