Subject: Re: [Detnet] draft-ietf-detnet-flow-information-model Intended Status

From: Balázs Varga A <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2020 07:40:04 +0000

Hi,
Updated version posted: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-detnet-flow-information-model/
Cheers
Bala'zs

-----Original Message-----
From: Balázs Varga A <[email-masked]> 
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2020 12:21 PM
To: Lou Berger <[email-masked]>; DetNet WG <[email-masked]>
Cc: [email-masked]; BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A (ATTLABS) <[email-masked]>
Subject: RE: draft-ietf-detnet-flow-information-model Intended Status

It is fine by me. Cheers Bala'zs

-----Original Message-----
From: Lou Berger <[email-masked]> 
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2020 2:38 PM
To: DetNet WG <[email-masked]>
Cc: [email-masked]; BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A (ATTLABS) <[email-masked]>
Subject: draft-ietf-detnet-flow-information-model Intended Status

Hi,
	In looking at draft-ietf-detnet-flow-information-model in preparation for last call I note that this document is listed as Standards Track. 
Given that frameworks are generally informational (including the
data-plane-framework) and our YANG document will instantiate this framework in an implementable form, I propose that this document's Intended status be changed to Informational.  Once this done we can start WG LC.

Are there any objections to making this document Informational and removing any formal conformance language?

Thank you,
Lou (As doc Shepherd/Co-Chair)