Subject: Re: [Detnet] Moving forward on queuing mechanism

From: Janos Farkas <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 12:19:25 +0000

WG,

Thank you very much for those who have expressed interested on working on this topic.

As a next step, could those who are interested put together a concise problem statement and possible related work items and send it to the list for discussion. Hopefully this could be done in time to support discussion at IETF 111.

Thank you,
Janos and Lou

-----Original Message-----
From: detnet <[email-masked]> On Behalf Of Lou Berger
Sent: Friday, April 9, 2021 2:45 PM
To: DetNet WG <[email-masked]>
Subject: [Detnet] Moving forward on queuing mechanism

WG,

There has been some discussion on if/where new DetNet related queuing mechanism should be specified.  One possibility is DetNet.  For us to undertake this work, which is atypical for a routing area WG, we will need to revise our charter to reflect the intended scope of our work. We'd like to get the discussion started on this scope.

We think the next step is for those who are interested in working on new queuing mechanisms for DetNet to help by providing a concise problem statement and possible related work items. The WG can then discuss any proposals, agree on the problem to be solved and work to be done.

Thank you,

Lou and Janos

_______________________________________________
detnet mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet