Subject: RE: [dhcwg] dhc WG last call on<draft-ietf-dhc-ddns-resolution-08.txt> REMINDER!

From: "Woundy, Richard" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 17:33:00 -0400

I agree that this draft needs to advance.

One really minor nit:

   One example of a situation that offers some extra assurances is one
   where the DHCP client is connected to a network through an MCNS cable
   modem...

Nobody calls it "MCNS" anymore -- at least not since 1998 or so. :^)

I would call it a DOCSIS cable modem. <http://www.cablemodem.com/>

-- Rich

-----Original Message-----
From: [email-masked] [mailto:[email-masked]] On Behalf
Of Ted Lemon
Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005 11:09 AM
To: Ralph Droms
Cc: [email-masked]
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] dhc WG last call
on<draft-ietf-dhc-ddns-resolution-08.txt> REMINDER!

Didn't we just go through this?   Yes, this draft needs to advance.    
Please advance it!   :')

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg