Subject: Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-client-id-02 [really -04]

From: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 14:45:43 +0000

The current draft is 04, not 02.

I am OK with advancing this draft.

However, might be nice to also include DHCPINFORM in this document? The DHCPACK sent in response should also include the Client Identifier option if sent in by the client (while this is generally not broadcast and may not suffer the same issues as the other messages, just be clean to allow the server to have consistent processing to include the Client Identifier in all responses to the client).

- Bernie

-----Original Message-----
From: [email-masked] [mailto:[email-masked]] On Behalf Of Ted Lemon
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2012 9:35 AM
To: dhc WG
Subject: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-client-id-02

The authors have requested a working group last call for this draft.   This is the document that clarifies the use of the DHCP client identifier by DHCP servers, particularly in cases where chaddr is zero.   Please review the draft and indicate on the mailing list whether you support its advancement or oppose its advancement.

We will determine consensus on August 24.

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg