Subject: Re: [dhcwg] WGLC Result - draft-ietf-dhc-container-opt-07 - Respond by 2013-04-28

From: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 01:01:41 +0000

This document did NOT pass WGLC as there was no support for it and Ralph indicated that there were several IESG Discusses from several years ago (2009) that did not get addressed. Also, Barbara Stark commented about " alternative solution that exists in BBF, for managed "RGs", for DHCPv6 options."

The authors are encouraged to update the draft addressing the open issues and try again.

However, we will need additional support for this work if it is to pass a future WGLC.

- Tomek & Bernie

-----Original Message-----
From: [email-masked] [mailto:[email-masked]] On Behalf Of Tomek Mrugalski
Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2013 10:54 AM
To: DHC WG
Subject: [dhcwg] WGLC - draft-ietf-dhc-container-opt-07 - Respond by 2013-04-28

Folks,
The authors of draft-ietf-dhc-container-opt-07 feel it's ready for WGLC.

This draft was active around 2010, but then expired. It was revived
(-06) in December 2012 and updated recently (-07). The last version is more explicit about which options are not allowed in the container option.

Please review the draft and indicate whether or not you feel it is ready to be published.  We have been getting very anemic responses to working group last calls recently. Your response matters, so please do respond.
Silent support is not enough. If not enough people voice their support, the document will not advance. Simply saying "I support this work" is enough. Providing detailed review is better, but not necessary.

Bernie and I will evaluate consensus after April 28.

At the time of this writing, there is no IPR reported against this draft.

Tomek
_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg