Subject: [dhcwg] Follow-up from IETF-93 (Prague) - DHCPv6 bis Issues (T1/T2 Times) - Respond by 8/24/2015

From: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 15:33:39 +0000

Hi:

As a follow-up from the IETF-93 (Prague) DHC WG session and the DHCPv6 bis Issues (see https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/93/slides/slides-93-dhc-7.pdf):

For slide #5, T1/T2 Times (#131), we want to confirm the WG consensus to adopt the proposal to define T1 = T2 = valid lifetime to mean client should Rebind or Solicit when lifetime expires.

Please respond if you do not agree with this proposal and please indicate why.

The rationale for this proposal is to make it clear what a server sends when it is unable to extend lifetimes on a lease (and the remaining lifetime is 'short').

-          Bernie (for draft-ietf-dhc-rfc3315bis coauthors)