Subject: Fwd: Question regarding DS1 MIB (RFC 2495)

From: Randy Presuhn <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 12:59:38 -0700 (PDT)

Hi -

I'm forwarding a non-subscriber post that for some
reason was sent to the disman WG mailing list.
Subscription instructions are available at
http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/disman-charter.html

 -------------------------------------------------------
 Randy Presuhn           [email-masked]
 Voice: +1 408 546-1006  BMC Software, Inc.  1-3141
 Fax:   +1 408 965-0359  2141 North First Street
 http://www.bmc.com/     San José, California 95131  USA
 -------------------------------------------------------
 My opinions and BMC's are independent variables.
 -------------------------------------------------------

> Received: from tattler.bmc.com (tattler.bmc.com [172.17.0.117])
> 	by dorothy.bmc.com (8.8.6 (PHNE_12836)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id CAA22521
> 	for <[email-masked]>; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 02:32:14 -0700 (PDT)
> Received: from fw-us-hou1.bmc.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
> 	by tattler.bmc.com (8.10.2/8.8.6) with SMTP id e939Vwj14449
> 	for <[email-masked]>; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 04:31:59 -0500 (CDT)
> Received: from esealnt461 (esealnt461.al.sw.ericsson.se [153.88.251.61])
> 	by albatross.wise.edt.ericsson.se (8.11.0/8.11.0/WIREfire-1.3) with SMTP id e939Vnt02579
> 	for <[email-masked]>; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 11:32:57 +0200 (MEST)
> Received: FROM esealnt743.al.sw.ericsson.se BY esealnt461 ; Tue Oct 03 11:25:37 2000 +0200
> Received: by esealnt743.al.sw.ericsson.se with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2651.58)
> 	id <T1RVB9N6>; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 11:31:48 +0200
> Message-ID: <[email-masked]>
> From: "Yosief Sium (ETO)" <[email-masked]>
> To: "[email-masked]'" <[email-masked]>
> Cc: [email-masked]
> Subject: Question regarding DS1 MIB (RFC 2495)
> Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 11:31:42 +0200 
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2651.58)
> Content-Type: text/plain;
> 	charset="ISO-8859-1"
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I've a little question regarding the trap dsx1LineStatusChange. This is sent whenever the status of an DS1/E1 line is changed. Based on this trap, the manager is supposed to browse dsx1ConfigTable to find out which line that changed the status. In case where you have a lot E1 lines, this may be time-consuming and inefficient. Is there any reason why dsx1LineIndex is sent with this trap so that the manager knows exactly which E1 line if affected without any extra effort? 
> 
> Thankfull for any input!
> 
> 
> Regards!
> Yosief Sium
>