Subject: Re: [Disman] Remops Implementation Survey

From: "Randy Presuhn" <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 14:05:06 -0700

Hi -

Two months have gone by, and I've seen no response, nor have I seen
any response to Juergen Quittek's call for implementation results last
November.  Should we abandon our attempt to update the document?

Randy

> From: "Randy Presuhn" <[email-masked]>
> To: "Disman (E-mail)" <[email-masked]>
> Sent: Monday, April 05, 2004 12:25 PM
> Subject: [Disman] Remops Implementation Survey
>

> Hi -
>
> Here is the Implementation Survey for RFC 2925, the Remote Operations MIBs.
> Please send responses to [email-masked] , or, if you would like your implementation
> to remain anonymous for the implementation report, to the WG chair at
> [email-masked].
>
> =================================================
>
> Implementation Survey for RFC 2925,
> Definitions of Managed Objects for Remote Ping,
> Traceroute, and Lookup Operations
>
>
> Module: DISMAN-PING-MIB
> Implementation Source:
> Management Application / Agent:
>
>
> GROUPs:
> pingGroup (y/n): _
> pingNotificationsGroup (y/n): _
> pingTimeStampGroup (y/n): _
>
> OBJECTs:
> pingMaxConcurrentRequests (rw/ro): __
> pingCtlStorageType (rw/ro): __
> pingCtlType (rw/ro): __
> pingCtlByPassRouteTable (rw/ro): __
> pingCtlSourceAddressType (rw/ro): __
>             unknown (y/n): _
>             ipv4 (y/n): _
>             ipv6 (y/n): _
>
> pingCtlSourceAddress (rw/ro): __
> pingCtlIfIndex (rw/ro): __
> pingCtlDSField (rw/ro): __
> pingResultsIpTargetAddressType:
>             unknown (y/n): _
>             ipv4 (y/n): _
>             ipv6: _
> pingResultsIpTargetAddress:
>      0 (y/n): _
>      4 (y/n): _
>      16 (y/n): _
>
>
> Module: DISMAN-TRACEROUTE-MIB
> Implementation Source:
> Management Application / Agent:
>
> GROUPs:
> traceRouteGroup (y/n): _
> traceRouteTimeStampGroup (y/n): _
> traceRouteNotificationsGroup (y/n): _
> traceRouteHopsTableGroup (y/n):
>
> OBJECTs:
> traceRouteMaxConcurrentRequests (rw/ro): __
> traceRouteCtlByPassRouteTable (rw/ro): __
> traceRouteCtlSourceAddressType rw/ro): __
> traceRouteCtlSourceAddress (rw/ro): __
> traceRouteCtlIfIndex (rw/ro): __
> traceRouteCtlMiscOptions (rw/ro): __
> traceRouteCtlStorageType (rw/ro): __
> traceRouteCtlDSField (rw/ro): __
> traceRouteCtlType (rw/ro): __
> traceRouteResultsIpTgtAddrType
>         unknown (y/n): _
>         ipv4 (y/n): _
>         ipv6 (y/n): _
> traceRouteResultsIpTgtAddr
>         0 (y/n): _
>         4 (y/n): _
>         16 (y/n): _
> traceRouteProbeHistoryHAddrType
>         unknown (y/n): _
>         ipv4 (y/n): _
>         ipv6 (y/n): _
> traceRouteProbeHistoryHAddr
>         0 (y/n): _
>         4 (y/n): _
>         16 (y/n): _
> traceRouteHopsIpTgtAddressType
>         unknown (y/n): _
>         ipv4 (y/n): _
>         ipv6 (y/n): _
> traceRouteHopsIpTgtAddress
>         0 (y/n): _
>         4 (y/n): _
>         16 (y/n): _
>
>
> Module: DISMAN-NSLOOKUP-MIB
> Implementation Source:
> Management Application / Agent:
>
> GROUPs
> lookupGroup (y/n): _
>
> OBJECTs:
> lookupMaxConcurrentRequests (rw/ro): __
> lookupPurgeTime (rw/ro): __
>
>
> Deployment / Operational Experience:
>
>
> Comments:
>
>
>

---

From: Juergen Quittek <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 02:39:55 +0200

Many thanks to all who submitted Remote Operations MIBs
implementation reports.

I know that also Juniper has an implementation.
Does anyone on the list have contacts to Juniper
and can ask there for an implementation report?

Below please find the form for the report.

Thanks,

    Juergen
-- 
Juergen Quittek        [email-masked]        Tel: +49 6221 90511-15
NEC Europe Ltd.,       Network Laboratories        Fax: +49 6221 90511-55
Kurfuersten-Anlage 36, 69115 Heidelberg, Germany   http://www.ccrle.nec.de

Module: DISMAN-PING-MIB
Implementation Source:

GROUPs:
pingGroup (y/n): _

OBJECTs:

GROUPs:
traceRouteGroup (y/n): _

OBJECTs:

GROUPs
lookupGroup (y/n): _

OBJECTs:

Comments: