Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] [Ext] Call for Adoption: draft-hal-adot-operational-considerations

From: "Henderson, Karl" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2019 20:42:58 +0000

Hi Paul,

To further clarify, we are not suggesting a change to the DoT protocol and are making liberal use of the final sentence in the Abstract of RFC7858 and echoed in the Introduction of RFC8310: "It does not prevent future applications of the protocol to recursive-to-authoritative traffic."

Regards,
Karl

On 8/15/19, 4:15 PM, "Paul Hoffman" <[email-masked]> wrote:

    On Aug 15, 2019, at 12:24 PM, Henderson, Karl <KHenderson=[email-masked]> wrote:
    > 
    > To be clear, ADoT is not a new standard. This is simply DNS over TLS as specified in RFC7858,
    
    RFC 7858 makes it clear that it is for stub-to-recursive. That is called out in the Abstract and the Introduction.
    
    > further defined as ADoT in https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hoffman-dns-terminology-ter-02,
    
    That is a, um, "creative" reading of the phrase "later defined".
    
    --Paul Hoffman