Subject: [DNSOP] Fwd: [dnssd] WGLC on draft-ietf-dnssd-mdns-dns-interop-02

From: Tim Chown <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 22:48:41 +0000

Hi,

Ralph and I would like to draw your attention to the following WGLC happening in the dnssd WG. We’ve already had some good comments from dnsop participants which have helped steer the draft to its current state, but we would welcome any further comments as described below.

Best wishes,
Tim

> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> From: Tim Chown <[email-masked]>
> Subject: [dnssd] WGLC on draft-ietf-dnssd-mdns-dns-interop-02
> Date: 17 March 2016 at 22:39:10 GMT
> To: [email-masked]
> 
> Dear dnssd WG participants,
> 
> We are initiating a WG Last Call today on draft-ietf-dnssd-mdns-dns-interop-02, as can be found at https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dnssd-mdns-dns-interop-02 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dnssd-mdns-dns-interop-02>.
> 
> The call runs for two weeks, and will thus close on Thursday 31st March.
> 
> Please send any comments (including indications of support for progression of the document as is) to the [email-masked] <mailto:[email-masked]> list. This draft will not be advanced for publication unless there is sufficient response and support from the WG.  And, of course, any substantive comments on the draft are strongly encouraged as well. 
> 
> We will discuss the comments arising from the WGLC in the WG meeting in BA on Monday 4th April.
> 
> Abstract
> 
>    Despite its name, DNS-Based Service Discovery can use naming systems
>    other than the Domain Name System when looking for services.
>    Moreover, when it uses the DNS, DNS-Based Service Discovery uses the
>    full capability of DNS, rather than using a subset of available
>    octets.  In order for DNS-SD to be used effectively in environments
>    where multiple different name systems and conventions for their
>    operation are in use, it is important to attend to differences in the
>    underlying technology and operational environment.  This memo
>    presents an outline of the requirements for selection of labels for
>    conventional DNS and other resolution systems when they are expected
>    to interoperate in this manner.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ralph and Tim
> dnssd WG co-chairs
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dnssd mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssd