Subject: [DNSOP] Post IETF 95 next steps on special use names

From: Suzanne Woolf <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 20:29:39 -0400

All,

First, thanks everyone for a very successful and productive WG meeting at IETF 95 last week— 2 sessions, 16 drafts on the agenda, plenty of good discussion. We’ve got a couple of calls for adoption and WGLC to kick off in the next week or two; we'll do that, as usual, in separate threads.

As previously described, the chairs have been considering the best way to follow up on the work done to date on special use names. 

The drafts we'll be discussing: 
		https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-problem-02.txt
		https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-tldr-sutld-ps-00.txt

The two high points are: the design team is done; and we now need comment on the problem statement drafts so we know how to proceed.

1. We believe the design team has been successful in meeting its deliverable of producing a problem statement draft. So we've concluded the design team as a WG activity, with thanks to the authors for their work. 

2. We now have two problem statement drafts (draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-problem-02 and draft-tldr-sutld-ps). We're seeking comment on both. In particular, we'd like to hear 
	* where you think the gaps are, and
	* which draft (if either) you'd like to see the WG adopt

The goal is to have picked a problem statement and be starting to gather possible solutions by the time we meet in Berlin for IETF 96.

So, please review both drafts and send your comments to the list. We’re particularly interested in which draft, if any, you’d like to see adopted by the WG.

best,
Suzanne & Tim