Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Moving forward on draft-ietf-dnsop-private-tld

From: Andrew Sullivan <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2021 18:30:59 -0400

Hi,

[Employed by ISOC, speaking for self]

Speaking as usual only for myself, it seems to me that if there were actual demand for a WG that would actually W as a G on actual extensions, it would be pretty trivial to charter it. What would be bad IMO is a “working group” that functioned instead as DNSGATE. But I, of course, don’t have much to contribute one way or the other. 

Best regards,

A

— 
Andrew Sullivan 
Please excuse my clumbsy thums

> On Jul 31, 2021, at 11:48, Ray Bellis <[email-masked]> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>> On 30/07/2021 19:29, Paul Wouters wrote:
>> 
>> We are seeing the WG dropping actual protocol work because of these
>> discussions.
> If only we had a working group for discussing DNS Extensions...
> 
> Ray
> 
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop