Subject: Re: [edu-team] Small topic for WG chairs lunch from IESG

From: Mirjam Kuehne <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 09:08:43 +0100

Hi,

See below. Is this something we want to cover during the WG chair
lunch at IETF 71? But is it enough? And who can talk about it?
Spencer?

Mirjam

On 02.12 14:43, Margaret Wasserman wrote:
> 
> This agenda is quite full, so if there is no rush I think it would  
> make sense to do this at IETF 71.
> 
> Margaret
> 
> On Dec 2, 2007, at 1:24 PM, Spencer Dawkins wrote:
> 
> >Hi, Margaret,
> >
> >Russ asked that the EDU team put something on SOME WG chairs lunch  
> >agenda (this IETF or next IETF, depending on how full your schedule  
> >is).
> >
> >The topic is about telling ADs when WGs are forwarding  
> >Informational documents that may need more review (requirements,  
> >architecture, frameworks, applicability) than typical Informational  
> >documents.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >
> >Spencer
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> edu-team mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/edu-team
_______________________________________________
edu-team mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/edu-team