Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-mmusic-media-loopback-22

From: Hadriel Kaplan <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2012 16:34:25 +0000

Hi Meral,
thank you for the review and comments!
All of them will be fixed as you suggested, in the next rev/submission.
Thanks again!

-hadriel

On Aug 24, 2012, at 12:16 AM, Meral Shirazipour wrote:

> Sorry for re-sending. The first attempt seem not working.
> 
> ________________________________________
> From: Meral Shirazipour
> Sent: Friday, August 24, 2012 12:00 AM
> To: [email-masked]; [email-masked]
> Subject: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-mmusic-media-loopback-22
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq> .
> 
> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-mmusic-media-loopback-22
> Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour
> Review Date: 2012-08-23
> IETF LC End Date: 2012-08-23
> IESG Telechat date: NA
> 
> 
> Summary:
> This draft is almost ready for publication as a standard track RFC, but I have some comments.
> 
> 
> Nits/editorial comments:
> 
> [Page 4] line 5, suggestion: "that always loop incoming media back for sessions." ----> "that always loop incoming media back for all sessions."
> 
> [Page 6] Section 3.1, suggestion for being consistent: "compliant to this memo" ----> "compliant to this specification"
> 
> [Page 7] Section 3.1, 'loopback' ----> "loopback"
> 
> [Page 10] paragraph 2, "as defined in later sections", if possible please specify the actual Section number.
> 
> [Page 12] line 1, "the offer must contain", please double check that this is not a "MUST"
> 
> [Page 13] Section 6, "from PLC" ----> "from Packet Loss Concealment (PLC) algorithm "
> 
> [Page 15] , please add Figure caption under the header format.
> 
> [Page 15] suggestion: "same clock rate MUST used " --missing be--> "same clock rate MUST be used "
> 
> "Loss RLE report block" ----> "Loss Run Length Encoding (RLE) report block"
> 
> Also
> -please run for section ##, and when referring to specific section use capital S in Section.
> -please spell out first occurrence of acronyms.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Meral
> 
> 
> 
> ---
> Meral Shirazipour
> Ericsson
> Research
> www.ericsson.com