Subject: Re: [Gen-art] review: draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-bearer-10

From: Jari Arkko <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 14:29:15 -0700

Thanks for the review. Kathleen, can you speak to Joel’s questions below? Thanks.

Jari

On 18 Sep 2014, at 14:47, Joel M. Halpern <[email-masked]> wrote:

> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
> Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
> 
> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
> you may receive.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-bearer-10
>  JSON Web Token (JWT) Profile for OAuth 2.0 Client Authentication and
>                          Authorization Grants
> Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern
> Review Date: 18-Sept-2014
> IETF LC End Date: 29-Sept-2014
> IESG Telechat date: N/A
> 
> Summary: This document appears to be ready for publicaiton as a Proposed Standard.
> 
> This reviewer would suggest that the General AD check with parties who can confirm the two notes below.
> 
> Note that the reviewer did not review RFC 6749, draft-ietf-oauth-assertions, or draft-ietf-oauth-json-web-token, but simply takes as given that the work here is consistent with that work.
> 
> Similarly, the reviewer assumes that the subtleties of internationalization of issuers (and any other fields that must be compared).  It is not obvious whether pointing to the RFC 3986 is sufficient, but it is not obviously insufficient.
> 
> Major issues: N/A
> 
> Minor issues:
>    I presume it is clear from the underlying documents whether the periods at the ends of intermediate lines in the examples are supposed to be there.
> 
> Nits/editorial comments: N/A
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art