Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-avtcore-5761-update-02

From: Elwyn Davies <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2016 22:36:32 +0100

That's fine.
Cheers,Elwyn

Sent from Samsung tablet.
-------- Original message --------From: Christer Holmberg <[email-masked]> Date: 04/10/2016  17:53  (GMT+00:00) To: Christer Holmberg <[email-masked]>, Elwyn Davies <[email-masked]> Cc: [email-masked], [email-masked] Subject: RE: Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-avtcore-5761-update-02 

Hi,
 
I submitted a new version (-05) of the draft, with the new title.
 
Regards,
 
Christer

From: Christer Holmberg [mailto:[email-masked]]

Sent: 04 October 2016 18:41

To: Elwyn Davies <[email-masked]>

Cc: [email-masked]; [email-masked]

Subject: RE: Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-avtcore-5761-update-02

Hi,

>I was just having a look at the updated draft - the changes are fine AFAICS.

>However, looking at it again, I think a more informative title would not go
>amiss.  How about:

> Clarifications to SDP offer/answer Negotiations in RFC 5761

>Sorry - should have noticed on previous pass.

Don’t worry – I agree a more informative title would be useful :)
 
What about “RFC 5761 SDP Offer/Answer Clarifications”?
 
Regards,
 
Christer

-------- Original message --------

From: Elwyn Davies <[email-masked]>

Date: 16/09/2016 23:45 (GMT+00:00)

To: Christer Holmberg <[email-masked]>

Cc: 
[email-masked], 
[email-masked] 

Subject: RE: Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-avtcore-5761-update-02

Hi Christer.

Thanks.  That's fine.

Cheers,

Elwyn

 

Sent from Samsung tablet.