Subject: Re: [GROW] WG Adoption call: draft-mcpherson-irr-routing-policy-considerations (END: 11/28/2012)

From: Christopher Morrow <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2013 10:35:27 -0500

Howdy, this draft did get renamed, but didn't get renamed properly for grow :(

draft-grow-irr-routing-policy-considerations-00.txt

could we re-spin the draft with a name more like:
  draft-ietf-grow-irr-routing-policy-considerations-00.txt

that way it'll show up in the grow work items list.

thanks!

On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 10:54 PM, Christopher Morrow
<[email-masked]> wrote:
> howdy... a few days late, but in the end there was some support for
> adopting it, and at least no non-support for it.
>
> Could the authors spin a re-titled draft and hopefully they are
> incorporating comments/etc as well?
>
> thanks!
> -chris
>
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 5:35 PM, Christopher Morrow
> <[email-masked]> wrote:
>> Grow Folks,
>> the authors of:  draft-mcpherson-irr-routing-policy-considerations
>>   <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mcpherson-irr-routing-policy-considerations-01>
>>
>> have asked if their work is appropriate for the GROW-wg, could we take
>> the next 14 days (ending Nov 28, 2012) to think/discuss this draft and
>> it's efficacy to work in the GROW arena? The abstract of the draft is:
>>   "The purpose of this document is to catalog past issues influencing
>>    the efficacy of Internet Routing Registries (IRR) for inter-domain
>>    routing policy specification and application in the global routing
>>    system over the past two decades.  Additionally, it provides a
>>    discussion regarding which of these issues are still problematic in
>>    practice, and which are simply artifacts that are no longer
>>    applicable but continue to stifle inter-provider policy-based
>>    filtering adoption and IRR utility to this day."
>>
>> Thanks!
>> -Chris
>> (co-chair)