Subject: [I2nsf] Please let us know the sessions you wish to avoid for IETF 96

From: Linda Dunbar <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 17:01:16 +0000

Here is the conflict to avoid based on IETF95 requests. 
Conflicts to Avoid: 
 First Priority:  i2rs,  idr, TRILL, L3SM,  TEAS, RTGarea, SUPA, NETconf, DOTS, SACM, SAAG, NFVrg  Second Priority:  sfc, RTGWG, NETMOD, MILE, SDNrg  Third Priority: NVO3. 

If you have more, please let us know. Note: it is not guaranteed to avoid all conflicts. We are trying. 

Cheers, 

Linda 

-----Original Message-----
From: "IETF Meeting Session Request Tool" [mailto:[email-masked]] 
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2016 11:19 AM
To: [email-masked]
Cc: [email-masked]; [email-masked]; [email-masked]; Linda Dunbar
Subject: i2nsf - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 96

A new meeting session request has just been submitted by Linda Dunbar, a Chair of the i2nsf working group.

---------------------------------------------------------
Working Group Name: Interface to Network Security Functions Area Name: Security Area Session Requester: Linda Dunbar

Number of Sessions: 1
Length of Session(s):  2 Hours
Number of Attendees: 60
Conflicts to Avoid: 
 First Priority:  i2rs,  idr, TRILL, L3SM,  TEAS, RTGarea, SUPA, NETconf, DOTS, SACM, SAAG, NFVrg  Second Priority:  sfc, RTGWG, NETMOD, MILE, SDNrg  Third Priority: NVO3

Special Requests:
  
---------------------------------------------------------