Subject: RE: [Icar] Thoughts on ICAR direction

From: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2004 21:40:18 +0100

> > (1) Document cross-area review criteria.  This would help to educate 
> > authors and ad hoc early reviewers in what to look for.
> > 
> > (2) Develop a process for WG chairs to use existing area review 
> > resources (MIB Doctors, GEN-ART, Security directorate, Ops directorate, 
> > etc.) to get early review for their documents?  Maybe this could be a 
> > proposed "July 14" experiment?
> 
> These are both good suggestions. I wonder if the charter of the TOOLs
> effort can be twisted a bit to host this work. It's interesting that
> we've had two damp squibs (SIRs and now apparently ICAR) but MIB
> doctoring, GEN-ART etc seem to be working nicely.
> 

I would hate to loose MIB doctor cycles though.
We are not staffed enough to even handle all MIB reviews in a timely fashion
at the moment.

Bert
>     Brian

_______________________________________________
Icar mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/icar