Subject: [Id-event] Thread: RFC7942 Listing implementations in drafts

From: Phil Hunt <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 08:10:58 -0800

Yaron has proposed that we include a list of known implementations that support the SET draft as per RFC7942.  My understanding is that this adds  a temporary section which is removed upon transition to RFC status.

AFAIK, since we are profiling JWTs, most of the current implementations should work.

Is there a known list I can start with?  Does anyone have information on any implementation compatibility issues with the SET draft so far?  E.g. some current implementations may not enable all of the capabilities set out in JWT and thus might not extend well to the SET profile.

Phil

Oracle Corporation, Identity Cloud Services & Identity Standards
@independentid
www.independentid.com <http://www.independentid.com/>[email-masked] <mailto:[email-masked]>