Subject: excusable

From: "Benjamin Mann" <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 21:07:30 -0300

Do you acknowledge that reversal of the chosen biomarkers may have no effect on the underlying processes of aging - and may even reduce life span, as seems to be the case for growth hormone? You don't have to let the lower regions of your brain - comfort now, and to hell with later - rule your life and by doing so cut it short. com notes the results of a study to published this month: "researchers found that elderly rats on a calorie-restricted diet had the muscle mass and function of much younger rats.
"DISCUSSIONThe highlights and headlines from the past week follow below.
The full paper for this research - which outlines thoughts on immortal DNA, stem cells and aging - is freely available at Cancer Research. In effect, we've all evolved to screw the person we're going to be; good now, not so good when you have become that person.
No one really understands why we age. "The goal now being pursued by the N. "The same goes for donations to worthy causes, such as the growing MPrize for anti-aging research and the associated donor-supported research projects of the Methuselah Foundation. We know that the number of c-kit positive cells decreases with age and that elderly patients don't recover from heart attacks as well as younger patients. Scientists found that treated animals had twice the number of proliferating neurons as control animals, and that many of the newly generated cells appeared to develop into dopamine neurons.