Subject: Re: bgpM2 module identity in draft-ietf-idr-bgp4-mibv2-03.txt?

From: "Bruno Rijsman" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 14:07:56 -0500

Okay, thanks Jeffrey.

Meanwhile, I found one very minor issue in the -03 version of the draft:

BGP4-V2-MIB DEFINITIONS ::= BEGIN
    IMPORTS
        [...]
        -- Note that the following reference to INET-ADDRESS-MIB
        -- refers to the version as published in the RFC 2851
        -- update internet draft.
        InetAddressType, InetAddress, InetPortNumber,
        InetAutonomousSystemNumber, InetAddressPrefixLength
            FROM INET-ADDRESS-MIB

The reference to RFC 2851 should be replaced by a reference to
RFC 3291 because InetPortNumber is only defined in RFC 3291.

>From: Jeffrey Haas <[email-masked]>
>To: Bruno Rijsman <[email-masked]>
>CC: [email-masked]
>Subject: Re: bgpM2 module identity in draft-ietf-idr-bgp4-mibv2-03.txt?
>Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 14:02:46 -0500
>
>Bruno,
>
>We will be pursuing getting a MIB-II OID as part of the next version of
>the draft.  I had been waiting on two things to occur:
>o Further discussion on the contents of this MIB
>o The BGP FSM text to become finalized so that it can be properly
>   incorporated into the MIB.
>
>This process will probably be started after the upcoming IETF.
>In the meanwhile, please be on the lookup for a new issue of the MIBv2
>draft.  All comments are appreciated.
>
>
>On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 01:25:32PM -0500, Bruno Rijsman wrote:
> > Has a value for XXX already been allocated for the bgpM2 module identity 
>of
> > BGP4-V2-MIB (in draft-ietf-idr-bgp4-mibv2-03.txt)? If not, when is this
> > expected to happen?
> >
> > BGP4-V2-MIB DEFINITIONS ::= BEGIN
> >     [...]
> >     bgpM2 MODULE-IDENTITY
> >         [...]
> >         ::= { mib-2 XXX }    <=== HERE
>
>--
>Jeff Haas
>NextHop Technologies

_________________________________________________________________
The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE*  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail