Subject: [Idr] draft-jdurand-auto-bfd-00

From: "Susan Hares" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 12:07:34 -0400

David and Jerome: 

Acee and Jeff Haas find this to be a useful solution to consider for FRR and
BGP. 

At the interim, it was suggested it would be useful for you to discuss on
the mail list: 

.         The differences between (draft-ietf-idrrs-bfd/draft-ymk-idr-bfd)
with your draft on the mail list? 

.         Any conflict between protection a BGP session at an IXP and
protecting the connectivity of a prefix? 

.         Any way this proposed standard changes BFD.

I'm sure I missed a few other valuable questions, but there seems to be real
interest in you leading a discussion on this point.   You can lead this
discussion on this thread or on the WG Adoption thread. 

Sue