Subject: Bonus Inbox Video: Covergirl Ellen Reveals-

From: DrOz Bonus Inbox Video <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2014 07:12:35 -0700

Live withDocOz - Celeb Edition
The Cure for Extremely Wrinkled Damaged Skin...

Ellen Degeneres Rumors Discussed;
The pics leaked to the media explain it all

[Never before seen]  View now -> http://www.hutpax.com/live/streaming/oz/episode.shtml

** In Depth**

She's Insane: Ellen does this every morning in order to look 20-years younger.

Erase wrinkles and sun damage In 1 STEP....ITS Unbelievable

For More Live Streaming Episodes -> http://www.hutpax.com/live/streaming/oz/episode.shtml

To modify message settings - write Current Update Alerts
at: one six four four Doral Dr Brookings, SD 57006 or visit http://www.hutpax.com/io4jrt.kmfri40

cony with the picture-perfect view looking out over a circular valley with snow-capped mountains and a perfect round lake in the centre - like looking into a volcano caldera. The pool, Jacuzzi, small gym and restaurant/bar all have the same fantastic view (there is also a hammam, and they can arrange massages on request). Our room was by far the most stylish we saw in Corsica, elegant and modern yet with many distinctly Corsican touches. Oh, and the entire property smells like the maquis, which if you have not experienced it, is reason enough to visit the island in spring!!! They do light dinners only, with usually one "menu of the day" as well as some simple salads/charcuterie choices - we ate there once and it was fantastic. There is also a very sophisticated & excellent "fancy" restaurant, A Pasturella, in the local village (walking distance - ask for a map), which we also enjoyed. You do need a car, but Ile Rousse (resort/beach town) is just down the hill about 10 minutes, and th
 e loop "en a book showing the local plants. My only recommendation would be to add a guide to the birds of Corsica (we saw at least 8 species just from our balcony alone, without binoculars!) - maybe binoculars to use/borrow/rent? Otherwise it is already perfect. Oh, breakfast is not included and is expensive - it looks amazing - but they kindly provide a fridge, so if you are not one for a big morning buffet you can easily pick up a few things and do your own on the balcony. There is a coffee machine with (limited) free coffee refills. I actually prefer to have theou are right. It should be noted for the js (or development) newbie that as a general practice, preferring readability/maintainability over fine tuning is probably best. In cases where tuning is necessary explanatory comments in an uncompressed version of ones code are invaluable for pointing out what's going on and why one is being 'tricky'.   jinglesthula Nov 26 '13 at 21:08
  	  	
Why !== ? I prefer != .   Nicolas Barbulesco Nov 29 '13 at 15:23
4	  	
@NicolasBarbulesco Automagically casting truthy/falsey values can be very dangerous if you don't know exactly what you're doing. See this post for a more thorough explanation of the difference in these two comparison operators.   DesertIvy Dec 5 '13 at 16:28
2	  	
@DesertIvy  In the light of this, I confirm that I prefer !=, not !==. Here, I don't want to test the types, I want to test only the values. Moreover, != is clear whereas !== is, at first, mysterious.   Nicolas Barbulesco Dec 6 '13 at 13:00
6	  	
@NicolasBarbulesco I am confident that all of the people who look at my code will know that [["\t\n 987654321e-400"]] === 0 is false. I am much less confident that everyone who looks at my code will know that [["\t\n 987654321e-432"]] == 0 is true.   kybernetikos Dec 11 '13 at 15:48 
10	  	
Blindly following the "always use !==" rule is not the answer here, you can safely use != if you know that you are comparing two numbers. -1 is NOT falsey and therefore != is always appropriate in this specific instance.   Greg Dec 11 '13 at 16:35
4	  	
@Greg Amen! I can't stand people who don't want to understand proper JS comparison rules and want to blindly follow the "always use strict comparison" rule (probably from Crockford). Strict comparison can cause bugs too.   Juan Mendes Feb 11 at 18:58 
3	  	
The squiggle (~str.indexOf()) could be considered idiomatic by now. Writing idiomatic JavaScript is good.   dalgard Apr 25 at 14:08
1	  	
@JuanMendes You "can't stand" those people? That seems...extreme.   Dustin Wyatt May 8 at 17:19
  	  	
@DustinWyatt I don't think it's extreme, it causes unnecessary extra code just because people who don't want to understand the difference. Specially since always using === is not the always the right answer, there are cases when you do need == and you'd need a lot of extra code to make code comply. It's the nature of a dynamic language.   Juan Mendes May 8 at 17:35
  	  	
@dalgard It's idiomatic? Maybe, but I find it confusing   Juan Mendes May 8 at 17:37
  	  	
But I thought Javascript doesn't have true integers. So -1 is represented as all 1's in floating point?   huggie Jun 8 at 7:13