Subject: Bust thru a plateau (OzClip)

From: Bring Back High-School Figure <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 15:14:48 -0700

The Decision that Will Permanently Change Your Body-Shape:
- Doc Oz Episode Recap - 

You dont have to be perfect to lose a tremendous amount of FAT-

See what 1 DocOz Tip will have you dropping 1-lb a day...
- while still eating carbs
- w/out working out

View Tip Here -> http://www.deewire.com/results/7days/episode.shtml

Stay tuned for More Fat-Melting Tips

`
`
`
`
To stop further messages - visit here http://www.deewire.com/35y/h6/34r/gj75eh/k8764h/fw22ss/jio8.vfmsw - or write  Updated Notifications Services
115 Hadley Way_C o u n c e, Tenessee 3 8 3 2 6-
-
-
-
-
"Vim goes closer to the unix philosophy." -- You are speaking here of the philosophy regarding the tools available from your shell. The shell itself, however, is a big agglomeration of built-ins, history, globbing, process control, programmability, and so on. Emacs clearly lies closer to the philosophy of unix shells: provide a highly customizable environment within which tools can be used together, and make it easy for the user to extend the set of tools with their own code snippets as they work. I think we can see that both emacs and vim Thanks for your comment. It was by no means my intention to start an editor war here neither was it to offend emacs users. I just find it easier and more portable to invoke the actual commands from shell (or from within the editor) as opposed to writing complex extensions to encapsulate the functionality in the emacs, which tends to make the environment bloated over time. These extensions however depends on the user preference and can be done but b
 y no means enforced by either of the editors. So agree with you regarding the emacs and vi(m) place in Just to continue the non-war, I hope it was clear that I did not disagree with your analogy "vim is more like a unix tool". It simply occurred to me that this intuition could be extended with "and emacs is more like a unix You can do everything you mention, and a lot more, in emacs (hexl-mode for example goes right to editing the file in hex with an ascii preview to the side). I know VI pretty well also, but creating macros is a lot easier and more flexible in Emacs, and it can simply do way more than even most modern VIM implementations. That's the reason to know it, because emacs is in most places and can offer a real text editing boost. 

ing to me TAUP's perspective of Emacs is outdated because , those days Emacs was an advantage to have one as it was a single app running that could do multiple things at a time - like irc , music , remote edit etc . However today you have excellent applications for each of these purpose and memory is not an issue as before too ... Imagine reading Gmail in Emacs - I mean Gmail interface really has awesome keybindings in built , customizing that into an Emacs Email Client is going to take considerable time and might not be as good as the original Gmail Interfac