Subject: Re: [Ietf-message-headers] HTTP header registration question

From: Graham Klyne <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 23:34:13 +0000

Sorry for very delayed response -- this message got 'filed' in one of those
dusty corners I only look into occasionally...

Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>> The standard of definition required will be higher for permanent
>> registration.
> 
> What are the requirements exactly?

Not so much an exact requirement, but I would expect the general quality of
specification to be comparable with that for any standard - sufficient for
creating interoperable implementations, etc.  For provisional registrations, a
more general statement of intent can suffice.

#g

-- 
Graham Klyne
For email:
http://www.ninebynine.org/#Contact

_______________________________________________
Ietf-message-headers mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-message-headers