Subject: RE: CCIE

From: "Michael B. Bellopede" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2000 10:49:20 -0400

Cedar or Oak?  I'd like the GT model please

-Michael B. Bellopede
 [email-masked]

-----Original Message-----
From: Feigel Reinhold (MC-AC/WES1) [mailto:[email-masked]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2000 4:18 PM
To: Ietf@Ietf. Org; 'mark.paton'
Subject: AW: CCIE

Forgive this spam again: I have got a large position of high quality wooden
coffins, and anyone recently died should contact for an immedate delivery
(having in mind the high summer temperature!).

To be honest, is there no way to prevent all the subscribers of this list
from become overloaded with such rubbish?  Probably no technical
possibility. Eventualy by overloading the capacity of the originating
computer by addressing hundreds of mails to it? I for myself would
appreciate if all subscriber agree not to answer such mails, just to ignore
and delete them without having read.

Reinhold 

> ----------
> Von:  mark.paton[SMTP:[email-masked]]
> Gesendet:     Mittwoch, 14. Juni 2000 15:25
> An:   Ietf@Ietf. Org
> Betreff:      CCIE
> 
> <<Datei: Mark. J.S Paton.vcf>>
> Forgive this spam, but I am looking for 7 CCIE's
> for locations in London, Silicon Valley,
> California and Tokyo.  Anyone interested please
> email me back and I will forward your details to
> HR.
> 
> Many thanks
> 
> Regards
> 
> Mark Paton CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng
> Mercury Network Systems Limited
> +44 585 649051
> +44 1256 761925
> http://www.mnsl.org
> 
> "Mercury Network Systems - The Unstoppable Force"
> 
> This e-mail is intended only for the addressee
> named above. As this e-mail may contain
> confidential or privileged information if you are
> not, or suspect that you are not, the named
> addressee or the person responsible for delivering
> the message to the named addressee, please
> telephone us immediately. Please note that we
> cannot guarantee that this message or any
> attachment is virus free or has not been
> intercepted and amended.
> 
> 
> The views of the author may not necessarily
> reflect those of the Company.
>