Subject: Re: [BEHAVE] Lack of need for 66nat : Long term impact to application developers

From: [email-masked] (Noel Chiappa)
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 09:03:14 -0500 (EST)

> From: David Conrad <[email-masked]>

    > The architecture is _ALREADY_ broken. 66NAT is merely another symptom
    > of the underlying disease.

Hey, that's what happens when you pick as 'the next generation of networking',
"X.25 with a larger sequence number space" (or, for you youngsters who don't
remember X.25, "ATM with a larger cell size").

	Noel
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf