Subject: Re: wrt draft-ietf-uta-email-tls-certs

From: =JeffH <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 14:54:08 -0800

>> This seems to me to be clearly "updating" or "profiling" RFC6125
 >> normative language, in the specific email use case.
 >
 > Profiling it for email, yes.  Why should that make it *update* the
 > document that specifies the general process?  Profiles need to
 > normatively reference what they profile, but not the other way 'round.

OK, I can live with that.  Thanks for the clarification,

=JeffH