Subject: Re: [EAI] ***SPAM*** 5.53 (5) RE: I am fine with the 4952bis draft

From: John C Klensin <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 08:47:01 -0400

--On Friday, August 13, 2010 20:36 +0800 Sean Shen 沈烁
<[email-masked]> wrote:

> Except there was one concern:
> 
> RFC821 appears in section 9.1, but this document is not listed
> in reference. Is it because it was obsolete by rfc2821 so that
> it don't have to be in the reference?

It is sort of a gray area since 821 has become part of
well-known Internet history.  However, it is much easier to just
add the reference than to consider the issue.  Consider it done.

Thanks for the careful reading.

    john