Subject: [Int-area] RSVP for IPv6 implementors: your use of RAO value 3

From: Jukka MJ Manner <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 16:51:08 +0300 (EEST)

Hi,

We are in the middle of fixing the IP Router Alert Option registry and 
allocations, and one issue affects the current RSVP implementations.

There are two values that indicate end-to-end RSVP:
"1" Datagram contains RSVP message 	[RFC2711]
"3" RSVP Aggregation Level 0		[RFC3175]

We are currently proposing that value "3" should be removed from use, and 
reserved (not to be allocated to any protocol). Thus, value "1" should be 
used to indicate end-to-end RSVP.

The question is: who have RSVP implementations for IPv6, and would this 
change break something?

Regards,
Jukka
_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area