Subject: RE: dialup PPP (material for interim meeting)

From: "Hesham Soliman (ERA)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 22:36:09 +0200

Ole, 

> > > >going back to the original question, based on your 
> > > >implementation experience, would hosts use 3041
> > > >on a PPP link ? 
> > > 
> > > 	please declare which addressing policy is in your mind, otherwise
> > > 	we cannot even diagnose...
> > > 
> > 	=> Stateless address autoconfigration. If the interface id 
> > 	as assigned to the host during PPP negotation, would 
> > 	you still use RFC 3041 later ? 
> > 	Note, I'm not referring to a /64 assignment or multi-link 
> > 	subnets, just a simple /128 one. 
> 
> current stateless address autoconfiguration does not allow assignment
> of a /128. i.e prefixes where the prefix length in the RA is 128.
> 
	=> Sure, but I wasn't referring to a prefix length of 128 I was referring 
	to assigning one address to a host on a ppp link. A /128 given to a 
	host.

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [email-masked]
--------------------------------------------------------------------