Subject: IPv6 MIB questions

From: "Kristine Adamson" <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 14:03:40 -0500

We are looking into implementing the draft IPv6 MIBs in the near future and
had questions about the new drafts:

   - I noticed that there is no current Compliance statement
   (ipv6Compliance??) in draft-ietf-ipngwg-rfc2011-update-00.txt.  Will
   this be updated soon?

   - In the new RFC2013, there is a udpListenerTable and a
   udpConnectionTable.  In our implementation, a UDP Listener can
   transition from the unconnected to the connected state, but not back
   again.  The Listener can also change which Remote IP address/port it is
   connected to.  When a Listener is in the connected state, would it be
   represented in both tables?  Or should a Listener only ever be
   represented in one of these tables?

   Thanks!

   Kristine Adamson
   IBM Communications Server for MVS: TCP/IP Development
   Internet e-mail:[email-masked]